Comments on: For fun: Correlation of US State with the number of clicks on online banners http://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/ Writing about statistics with R, and open source stuff (software, data, community) Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Labor Day = Yeah | seoAMPED.comhttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-3191 Labor Day = Yeah | seoAMPED.com Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:50:57 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-3191 [...] not about fixing the conversation. Its about filling in the blanks. If people are prone to click on something that is exactly what they will get, even if it is not something they [...] [...] not about fixing the conversation. Its about filling in the blanks. If people are prone to click on something that is exactly what they will get, even if it is not something they [...]

]]> By: Labor Day = Yeah | Nerd Alert Marketinghttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-3188 Labor Day = Yeah | Nerd Alert Marketing Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:00:49 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-3188 [...] not about fixing the conversation. Its about filling in the blanks. If people are prone to click on something that is exactly what they will get, even if it is not something they [...] [...] not about fixing the conversation. Its about filling in the blanks. If people are prone to click on something that is exactly what they will get, even if it is not something they [...]

]]> By: האם דיבור בנייד עלול באמת לגרום לסרטן?http://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-2666 האם דיבור בנייד עלול באמת לגרום לסרטן? Sun, 23 May 2010 10:23:40 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-2666 [...] בו כדיהסקת מסקנות חד משמעית! כמו שכתבתי בהרחבה בזמנו כאן, קורלציה איננה סיבתיות. זה ששני דברים קרו ביחד, לא אומר [...] [...] בו כדיהסקת מסקנות חד משמעית! כמו שכתבתי בהרחבה בזמנו כאן, קורלציה איננה סיבתיות. זה ששני דברים קרו ביחד, לא אומר [...]

]]> By: כיצד העיתונות בארץ מפחידה אנשים שטלפונים סלולרים עושים סרטן : המדריך לטרמפיסט בסטטיסטיקהhttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-2626 כיצד העיתונות בארץ מפחידה אנשים שטלפונים סלולרים עושים סרטן : המדריך לטרמפיסט בסטטיסטיקה Tue, 18 May 2010 08:19:11 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-2626 [...] בשביל הסקת מסקנות חד משמעית! כמו שכתבתי בהרחבה בזמנו כאן, קורלציה איננה סיבתיות. זה ששני דברים קרו ביחד, לא אומר [...] [...] בשביל הסקת מסקנות חד משמעית! כמו שכתבתי בהרחבה בזמנו כאן, קורלציה איננה סיבתיות. זה ששני דברים קרו ביחד, לא אומר [...]

]]> By: Tal Galilihttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-330 Tal Galili Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:28:35 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-330 Thank you for the reply StefanieLMT - it's comments like yours that makes blogging so much fun :) Thank you for the reply StefanieLMT – it’s comments like yours that makes blogging so much fun :)

]]> By: StefanieLMThttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-329 StefanieLMT Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:20:53 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-329 @SocialMedia tweeted the Chitika post which how I found your post which should be REQUIRED READING for anyone in the media. (Or government for that matter)excellent, easy to understand post @SocialMedia tweeted the Chitika post which how I found your post which should be REQUIRED READING for anyone in the media. (Or government for that matter)

excellent, easy to understand post

]]> By: Tal Galilihttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-326 Tal Galili Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:59:36 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-326 Hi Eyal, thank you for the very kind reply.I will add a "conclusion" section... Hi Eyal,
thank you for the very kind reply.

I will add a “conclusion” section…

]]> By: Eyal Selahttp://www.r-statistics.com/2010/02/for-fun-correlation-of-us-state-with-the-number-of-clicks-on-online-banners/comment-page-1/#comment-325 Eyal Sela Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:55:39 +0000 http://www.r-statistics.com/?p=139#comment-325 Tal, This is a great post! It is so rare to find posts/articles with real added value. By added value I mean using and analyzing raw data, not just talking about outer's conclusions... (and also using layman terms to explain them).I think you should add a bit more of your opinion about the research. You're impaling that its conclusions may not be valid, but what is your opinion about them? Tal,
This is a great post! It is so rare to find posts/articles with real added value. By added value I mean using and analyzing raw data, not just talking about outer’s conclusions… (and also using layman terms to explain them).

I think you should add a bit more of your opinion about the research. You’re impaling that its conclusions may not be valid, but what is your opinion about them?

]]>